Started by Tallen, August 29, 2011, 12:44:00 pm
Quote from: lovesblessing on August 31, 2011, 12:43:21 pmIn this thread I have seen nothing that is the gospel of God's grace, or Jesus.....just alot of argl-bargl about alot of man made rules and regulations!No life, no joy..... only the ministry of death........condemnation......"you don't worship correctly according to my special beliefs, so you must be all wrong in your beliefs"....yada, yada, yada......phariseeism gone to seed.......blah! Lots of noise and hot air, producing nothing of value.Waste of time.....for someone who claims he doesn't have much time to spend, you sure seem able to spend alot making long useless posts here, Tallon......
Quote from: JohnDB on August 31, 2011, 01:02:02 pmTallen,I agree with Lovesblessing. And in the meantime I am so taken with your arguments to me I am speechless & have nothing to reply with. But the day I darken the door of any calvinist church will be a cold day somewhere known for heat. So trust me. You've won. I've seen the error of my ways of ever speaking to a calvinist.
Quote from: Sarah on August 31, 2011, 02:04:06 pmIs there another scripture that goes along with the one in Deut.?
Quote from: Sarah on August 31, 2011, 11:36:28 pmI would like to know if anyone that is a member and uses flags, has a cross, etc. feels they are worshiping God the wrong way.
Quote from: Tallen on August 31, 2011, 11:55:09 pmI have given scripture to answer this. It isn't up to how we feel, but the way YHWH has told us.I understand if you don't continue.
Quote from: pastorzzub on September 01, 2011, 03:23:58 amAlso, I am now convinced that Tallen is not being entirely honest. They claim to love this regulatory principle and that it is the heart of the Reformation, yet initially were totally unaware it came from Calvin's pen and resisted the idea that he was quoting or defending Calvin. If you held a principle that dearly, you know where it came from. Also, the fact that they were unaware that most of the Reformation rejected that principle is either a sign that they do not know what they are talking about or are deliberately exalting this one principle.
Quote from: pastorzzub on September 06, 2011, 02:44:57 pmYou read your principle into that sentence as well as into the world!
Quote from: Tallen on September 06, 2011, 02:48:55 pmAnother unsubstanciated accusation. But thanks for the comment.
Quote from: JTM³ on September 06, 2011, 05:50:50 pmHey Tallen, thanks for bumping.Now I get to post this :
Page created in 0.131 seconds with 20 queries.